Dell P2715q Monitor Driver For Mac
Retz wrote: I want to buy a decent monitor for editing photos (and watching movies on the side). Dell U2715H 27 seems to be popular and has a good reputation. Then there is the P2715Q which is 4k and supports many more colors. 'More colors' on the P2715Q has to do with support for 10-bit color depth – not, as far as I can tell, with support for a wider color gamut. Dell claims that both monitors cover 99% of sRGB, but in a quick scan, I didn't see any mention of Adobe RGB or DCI P3. I believe that the Mac does not support 10-bit color depths very well (yet), and so either monitor would run in 8-bit mode on your machine.
To maximize the savings one could buy a Mac Mini and add a Dell monitor, this would give you the biggest bang for your buck. However all the monitors we mention in this article can be used with any Mac computer with the proper connections. Dell Ultra HD 4k Monitor P2715Q 27-Inch Screen LED-Lit Monitor. Dell P2715Q vs Dell U2718Q and Support for HDMI 2.0 (4k @60Hz) (self.Monitors) submitted 1 month ago by bundt_chi I'm finally upgrading my Desktop and as such will be tossing my 10 year old 1080P monitor for a nice 4K IPS panel (no gaming, media creation, consumption and software development only).
What I don't get is that both of them sell for almost the same price on Amazon. So I'm not sure how good the P2715Q is. Maybe the P2715Q uses a panel designed for a UHDTV and is getting a benefit from TV production economies of scale?!?
QuickTime 7 and QuickTime Player 7 are no longer supported by Apple and will not be compatible with future macOS releases. Microsoft Windows now includes built-in support for many standards-based media formats that QuickTime 7 for Windows originally enabled. 
(The 2560x1440 panels surely get some economy of scale benefits from TV production, but perhaps not as much, given that no TV sets use that particular resolution.) Note that UHDTV resolution is somewhat awkward for a 27' monitor. You will probably want to use a 'scaled' resolution that is higher than Retina 'best' resolution (1920x1080), but lower than native LCD resolution (3840x2060). Retz wrote: I want to buy a decent monitor for editing photos (and watching movies on the side).
Dell U2715H 27 seems to be popular and has a good reputation. Then there is the P2715Q which is 4k and supports many more colors. What I don't get is that both of them sell for almost the same price on Amazon. So I'm not sure how good the P2715Q is. Also has anybody used either of them with a Macbook Pro 2012?
If you know other good monitors in the same price range I'd like to hear about it. Don't think a 2012 MBP supports external 4k nor 10-bit colour. Retz wrote: Thank you. So P2715Q is out. I found the ASUS PA279Q as well. I don't know if the extra contrast ratio and color support is worth the extra price for someone like me (hobbyist). It has 10 bit color as well but I will upgrade my McBook in 2 years.
I tested a variety of monitors with my 2015 MacBook Pro 13', which is the first 13' model to support 4k. I ended up getting the 24' 4k (actually UHD) sRGB model by Dell because I wanted text that is near-retina sharp. I noticed that running 4k monitors run in 2k mode, and 5k monitors run in 2.5k mode, offer text that is near retina sharp, at least to my eye. Much sharper than a normal 2k 24' monitor or 2.5k 27' monitor. These are the defaults by the way, when you start up a machine (that is, my MBP defaults to 2k mode when I plug in a 4k monitor). Everything is way too tiny in real 4k or 5k mode, but the extra pixels are wonderful for resolution. If you walk into an Apple store and look at the beautiful (and now wide gamut) 27' iMac, the screen is 5k but run at 2.5k.