Is Kaspersky Internet Security Good For Mac
The Kaspersky Internet Security for Mac is part of the Antivirus Software test program at Consumer Reports. In our lab tests, Antivirus Software models like the Internet Security for Mac are rated. Kaspersky Internet Security (starting at $80 for three systems) adds parental controls, webcam protections, a hardened web browser, anti-theft software and up to 200MB a day of secure data over a VPN.
Put to the test: 9 products for home users, 4 solutions for business users The laboratory of AV-TEST examined a total of 13 products under MacOS Sierra. The first 9 on the list are for home users: Avast Security 12.9 Bitdefender Antivirus for Mac 6.1 Comodo Antivirus 2.2 F-Secure Safe 17.0 Intego Mac Internet Security X9 10.9 Kaspersky Lab Internet Security for Mac 18.0 Sophos Home 1.2 Symantec Norton Security 7.5 Trend Micro Antivirus 8.0 4 solutions for business users ESET Endpoint Security 6.5 McAfee Endpoint Security for Mac 10.2 SentinelOne Next Generation Endpoint Security Software 2.0 Sophos Central Endpoint 9.6 All versions were evaluated under identical iMacs running on MacOS Sierra 10.12.6. The solutions were installed in the test as additional protection for MacOS Sierra. None of the security packages switched off the internal protection functions of MacOS Sierra. High detection rates for many security packages In the test involving packages for home users, a total of 6 out of 9 packages detected the 514 selected MacOS attackers: Avast, Bitdefender, Kaspersky Lab, Sophos, Symantec and Trend Micro.
Intego overlooked a few malware samples, yet still attained a good 99.4 percent. F-Secure delivered a somewhat weaker performance with 93.8 percent. The security package from Comodo only detected an unacceptable 38.1 percent. Among the solutions for corporate users, the products from ESET, SentinelOne and Sophos detected all attackers 100 percent.
Endpoint Security from McAfee experienced a minor detection error: 99.6 percent. In an additional test, the detection performance of Windows files was also evaluated. While these are innocuous on a Mac, in a mixed network, malware could thus hide on a Mac – especially when it is used as a server. For consumer users, the packages from Bitdefender, Kaspersky Lab and Trend Micro demonstrated superb detection rates between 99 and 100 percent. Likewise, high detection rates among corporate solutions were reached by ESET, McAfee and Sophos.
Lots of protection with a low system load In the past, many Mac security packages demonstrated a conspicuously high system load. The fact that those days are now over can be seen in the test segment on speed. In evaluating this criterion, the testers copied a selection of files on a reference system encompassing a volume of 27.28 GB, clocking the time necessary for the operation.
In addition, various downloads were performed, and these times were also recorded. On the reference system, the copying took 147 seconds, and the downloads lasted 56 seconds. Microsoft excel for mac download. Java path for mac. The exactly identical copying procedure and the same downloads were then repeated with each security solution installed, and the times were measured. Using this method, it quickly becomes apparent which antivirus solution requires too many resources in everyday use, thereby slowing down a Mac system. System load on products for home users The security packages for consumer users from Kaspersky Lab, Trend Micro and Symantec added a load of a mere 1 to 2 additional seconds when copying and downloading. Those levels are actually unnoticeable in everyday use. All these packages also achieved the 100 percent mark in detection.
Bitdefender and Sophos Home did just as good a job at detection, but required as much as 6 to 13 seconds more time. F-Secure and Intego delayed the test procedure by 21 to 35 seconds. Avast Security did indeed deliver error-free detection, but it slowed down the system in the test procedure by 73 seconds – that is too much. In response to a query, the manufacturer stated that in the tested version the standard default configuration was still set to immediate validation during download and not after download as is the case with other products. In the new subsequent version, they changed the default setting to validate the download afterwards, which saves lots of time.